Long-Term Growth and Short-Term Economic Instability

By Philippe Martin, C. A. Rogers. 2000

321 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

On the relationship between growth and volatility (2004, background): “…a number of factors, most notably the mechanism responsible for generating technological change and the parameters governing attitudes towards risk and uncertainty (e.g., Aghion and Saint-Paul, 1998a,b; Blackburn and Galindev, 2003; de Hek, 1999; Jones et al., 1999; Martin and Rogers, 1997, 2000).”
Growth and Volatility (2007, methodology): “2These results are largely con rmed in Martin and Rogers (2000), who use European regional data, and a slightly di¤erent international sample.”
Financial Openness and Business Cycle Volatility (2002, result): “In contrast to earlier work, which makes use of the standard deviation of the growth rate of real GDP to approximate output volatility (Ramey and Ramey 1995, Martin and Rogers 2000, see also Table 4), we follow Mills (2000) who argues that this concept is not probate to measure business cycles.”
Policy Volatility, Institutions, and Economic Growth (2013, background): “This group includes Ramey and Ramey (1995), Kormendi and Meguire (1985), Imbs (2007), Martin and Rogers (2000), Hnatkovska and Loayza (2005), and Aghion et al. (2005).”
The effect of financial crises on potential output: New empirical evidence from OECD countries (2012, unknown): “Martin, P. and C.A Rogers (2000), “Long-Term Growth and Short-Term Economic Instability”, European Economic Review, 44, 359-381.”