Age-structure, urbanization, and climate change in developed countries: revisiting STIRPAT for disaggregated population and consumption-related environmental impacts

543 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Urbanization and renewable and non-renewable energy consumption in OECD countries: An empirical analysis (2014, background): “which Liu (2009) finds the presence of a unidirectional causality running from urbanization to total energy consumption both in the long run and in the short run.”
Impact of institutional quality on environment and energy consumption: evidence from developing world (2020, background): “Urbanization matters for environmental quality demographic factors and Liddle and Lung (2010) have shown a positive and nonsignificant effect of urbanization on aggregate carbon dioxide emissions for a cross section of 17 developed countries.”
Consumption-Driven Environmental Impact and Age Structure Change in OECD Countries: A Cointegration-STIRPAT Analysis (2011, unknown): “…STIRPAT studies have considered aggregate emissions other than carbon dioxide (e.g., Cole and Neumayer 2004 also considered sulphur emissions, and Rosa, York, and Dietz 2004 considered methane emissions too), only Liddle and Lung (2010) disaggregated environmental impact by demand or causal sector.”
The effect of urbanization on CO2 emissions in emerging economies (2014, unknown): “First, the relationship between urbanization and carbon dioxide emissions has been studied by a number of authors (eg. Cole and Neumayer, 2004; Hossain, 2011; Liddle and Lung, 2010; Martinez-Zarzoso and Maruotti, 2011; Parikh and Shukla, 1995; Poumanyvong and Kaneko, 2010; Sharma, 2011; York et al.,”