Intangible Capital and Growth in Advanced Economies: Measurement Methods and Comparative Results

By Carol Corrado, Jonathan Haskel, C. Jona-Lasinio, Massimiliano Iommi. Social Science Research Network, 2012

202 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We present a harmonized data set on intangible investment for a number of EU countries and an analysis of growth.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The deteriorating usefulness of financial report information and how to reverse it (2018, unknown): “Similar intangible-tangible trends exist in various developed economies, see, for example, Corrado et al. (2012).”
Intangible investment in the EU and US before and since the Great Recession and its contribution to productivity growth (2018, background): “More recently, great efforts have been devoted to producing harmonised national estimates.2 This has led to the publication of the INTAN-Invest dataset, which covered 27 countries of the European Union, plus Norway and the United States (Corrado et al., 2012).”
Does the United States Have a Productivity Slowdown or a Measurement Problem? (2016, methodology): “Intangibles: Data are from Corrado and Jäger (2015), which in turn updates U.S. estimates from Corrado et al. (2009) and Corrado et al (2012).”
Misallocation, Establishment Size, and Productivity (2017, unknown): “…for instance Hsieh and Klenow (2009), Bloom and Van Reenen (2010), Bloom et al. (2010), Pagés (2010), Gal (2013), Bloom et al. (2013), among others for evidence of firm-level productivity differences across countries, and Corrado et al. (2012) for cross-country differences in intangible capital.”