An atmospheric perspective on North American carbon dioxide exchange: CarbonTracker

By W. Peters, A. Jacobson, Colm Sweeney, A. Andrews, T. Conway, K. Masarie, John B. Miller, L. Bruhwiler, G. Pétron, A. Hirsch and 6 more. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2007

1,070 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We present an estimate of net CO2 exchange between the terrestrial biosphere and the atmosphere across North America for every week in the period 2000 through 2005. This estimate is derived from a set of 28,000 CO2 mole fraction observations in the global atmosphere that are fed into a state-of-the-art data assimilation system for CO2 called CarbonTracker. By design, the surface fluxes produced in CarbonTracker are consistent with the recent history of CO2 in the atmosphere and provide constraints on the net carbon flux independent from national inventories derived from accounting efforts. We find the North American terrestrial biosphere to have absorbed −0.65 PgC/yr (1 petagram = 1015 g; negative signs are used for carbon sinks) averaged over the period studied, partly offsetting the estimated 1.85 PgC/yr release by fossil fuel burning and cement manufacturing. Uncertainty on this estimate is derived from a set of sensitivity experiments and places the sink within a range of −0.4 to −1.0 PgC/yr. The estimated sink is located mainly in the deciduous forests along the East Coast (32%) and the boreal coniferous forests (22%). Terrestrial uptake fell to −0.32 PgC/yr during the large-scale drought of 2002, suggesting sensitivity of the contemporary carbon sinks to climate extremes. CarbonTracker results are in excellent agreement with a wide collection of carbon inventories that form the basis of the first North American State of the Carbon Cycle Report (SOCCR), to be released in 2007. All CarbonTracker results are freely available at http://carbontracker.noaa.gov.

Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6bf90a62d728887988865a9085e25f2262db62f2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atmospheric Science

  1. David Crisp
  2. Frédéric Chevallier
  3. Paul O. Wennberg
  4. Heinrich Bovensmann
  5. Oliver Schneising
  6. John P. Burrows
  7. Michael Buchwitz
  8. Christopher W. O'Dell

In Global and Planetary Change

  1. David Crisp
  2. Frédéric Chevallier
  3. Paul I. Palmer
  4. Liang Feng
  5. Paul O. Wennberg
  6. Heinrich Bovensmann
  7. Oliver Schneising
  8. John P. Burrows

Citations in the corpus