Forest Dynamics, Growth and Yield: From Measurement to Model

By H. W. Kassier. 2011

358 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6b911b809fbc70464197b1cbbd7c82beb9b604bb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Response of sugar maple (Acer saccharum, Marsh.) tree crown structure to competition in pure versus mixed stands (2016, background): “This modification of the growth environment can trigger crown morphological traits variability of species ‘‘A”, which go beyond the known range of these traits in pure stands (Bayer et al., 2013; Pretzsch, 2009b).”
Insights from full-rotation Nelder spacing trials with Eucalyptus in São Paulo, Brazil (2010, background): “The most common design for spacing trials often tests three or four levels in small rectangular plots, with three or four replicate plots placed within an area of a few hectares (Walters 1973, Gonçalves et al. 2004, Pretzsch 2009).”
Drought can favour the growth of small in relation to tall trees in mature stands of Norway spruce and European beech (2018, methodology): “…stand characteristics such as mean diameters and heights for the total stand and dominant trees, stand basal area (BA), or standing volume stock per hectare (v) and stand volume growth (iv) for the surveys in 1998– 2016 were evaluated following the DESER-Norm from 1993 (Johann 1993; Pretzsch 2009).”
Manual for building tree volume and biomass allometric equations: from field measurement to prediction (2012, neutral): “Tree growth in such stands has been the subject of much study (de Perthuis, 1788 in Batho & García, 2006) and the principles described below can be fairly universally applied (Assmann, 1970; Dhôte, 1991; Skovsgaard & Vanclay, 2008; Pretzsch, 2009; García, 2011).”
Light absorption and use efficiency in forests: Why patterns differ for trees and stands (2013, background): “…trees tend to show both increased light absorption and increased efficiency of light use (D); (E = Eucalyptus, P = Picea), and no stands showed a negative interaction. indirect approaches over the past century to gauge the effectiveness of trees and stands in absorbing light (Pretzsch, 2010).”
Forest Growth and Yield Modeling (2011, background): “Regardless, SILVA is useful for a range of practical, scientific, and educational purposes (Pretzsch, 2009, p. 515).”