Non-Autoregressive Neural Text-to-Speech
By Kainan Peng, Wei Ping, Zhao-long Song, Kexin Zhao. 2019
119 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Natural Language Processing
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Natural Language Processing
Citations in the corpus
- DiffWave: A Versatile Diffusion Model for Audio Synthesis (2020, methodology): “In contrast to GAN or VAE-based models (Donahue et al., 2019; Peng et al., 2020), it is much easier to train without mode collapse, posterior collapse, or training instability stemmed from the joint training of two networks.”
- WaveGrad: Estimating Gradients for Waveform Generation (2020, methodology): “, 2020), variational auto-encoder models (Peng et al., 2020), as well as models inspired by digital signal processing (Ai & Ling, 2020; Engel et al.”
- A Survey on Neural Speech Synthesis (2021, methodology): “Some works such as ParaNet [262] and Flow-TTS [228] uses positional attention [264] for the text and speech alignment in parallel generation.”
- Conditional Variational Autoencoder with Adversarial Learning for End-to-End Text-to-Speech (2021, methodology): “Parallel TTS models (Ren et al., 2019; Peng et al., 2020; Kim et al., 2020; Ren et al., 2021; Lee et al., 2021), on the other hand, have been relied on deterministic duration prediction.”
- AdaSpeech: Adaptive Text to Speech for Custom Voice (2021, methodology): “We build AdaSpeech based on the popular non-autoregressive TTS models (Ren et al., 2019; Peng et al., 2020; Kim et al., 2020; Ren et al., 2021) and further design several techniques to address the challenges in custom voice: • Acoustic condition modeling.”
- It's Raw! Audio Generation with State-Space Models (2022, neutral): “(iii) Autoencoders: WaveNet Autoencoder [11] and WaveVAE [31], which use WaveNets in their encoders.”
- Glow-TTS: A Generative Flow for Text-to-Speech via Monotonic Alignment Search (2020, background): “In addition, most of the autoregressive models show a lack of robustness in some cases [20, 16].”
- WaveFlow: A Compact Flow-based Model for Raw Audio (2019, neutral): “Several neural textto-speech (TTS) systems have been introduced, including WaveNet (van den Oord et al., 2016), Deep Voice 1 & 2 & 3 (Arık et al., 2017a;b; Ping et al., 2018), Tacotron 1 & 2 (Wang et al., 2017; Shen et al., 2018), Char2Wav (Sotelo et al., 2017), VoiceLoop (Taigman et al., 2018), Wav”
- Semi-Supervised Speech Recognition via Local Prior Matching (2020, methodology): “Several methods can be used to estimate the text length on an unlabeled utterance, including the average speaking rate (Peng et al., 2019) or a phoneme/syllable segmentation (Adell & Bonafonte, 2004; Scharenborg et al., 2010; Wang et al., 2017).”
- SC-GlowTTS: an Efficient Zero-Shot Multi-Speaker Text-To-Speech Model (2021, methodology): “We synthesize 15 different sentences as in [36] 10 times for each of the 11 speakers of the VCTK test set and calculated the average.”
- One TTS Alignment to Rule Them All (2021, methodology): “These models generally rely on ex-ternal aligners [4] like the Montreal Forced Aligner (MFA) [10], or on durations extracted from a pre-trained autoregressive model (or forced aligner) [5,7,11] like Tacotron 2 [2].”
- RAD-TTS: Parallel Flow-Based TTS with Robust Alignment Learning and Diverse Synthesis (2021, background): “Recent works (Kim et al., 2020; Miao et al., 2020; Peng et al., 2020) have presented increasingly parallel solutions to address these concern.”
- DiffGAN-TTS: High-Fidelity and Efficient Text-to-Speech with Denoising Diffusion GANs (2022, background): “They either leverage an external text-to-acoustic alignment module (Ren et al., 2019; 2021a; Peng et al., 2020; Elias et al., 2021) or jointly train one within the TTS model (Zeng et al., 2020; Miao et al., 2021; Badlani et al., 2021).”
- Translatotron 2: High-quality direct speech-to-speech translation with voice preservation (2021, result): “However, it caused a significant regression on the naturalness of the predicted translation speech, which is consistent with the observation in TTS in Shen et al. (2020); Peng et al. (2020); Hwang et al. (2021), etc., suggesting more exploration is needed on this direction.”
- An Overview of Affective Speech Synthesis and Conversion in the Deep Learning Era (2022, background): “DL-based methods can be taxonomized along several categories : 1) autoregressive (AR) [14] versus non-AR (NAR) structures [70]; 2) type of network structure , where we primarily differentiated between convolutional neural networks (CNNs) [66], [67], sequential models (RNNs, gated recurrent unit…”