Forest site productivity: a review of the evolution of dendrometric concepts for even-aged stands

By J. P. Skovsgaard, Jerome K. Vanclay. 2008

593 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Environmental Engineering, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6b7947cbf7e8e991f83930fbe8d4edeb75cff67d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Environmental Engineering

In Global and Planetary Change

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Characterization of the structure, dynamics, and productivity of mixed-species stands: review and perspectives (2015, methodology): “As the height development of a forest stand is linked to many other stand attributes, it is commonly used for characterising the species-specific dynamics of pure stands (Skovsgaard and Vanclay 2008).”
How Forest Management affects Ecosystem Services, including Timber Production and Economic Return: Synergies and Trade-Offs (2012, background): “In addition to this rotation length-related effect, the stand density regime within the FMAs influenced volume productivity of spruce and beech (Pretzsch 2004, Skovsgaard and Vanclay 2008).”
Site-specific height growth models for six common tree species in Denmark (2009, background): “…chronological age has been widely used in forestry as a practical measure of site and forest productivity, and productivity has been classified based on observations of stand height and age in combination with species- and site-specific height development patterns (Skovsgaard & Vanclay, 2008).”
Mapping forest age using National Forest Inventory, airborne laser scanning, and Sentinel-2 data (2020, background): “Site index is commonly determined by measuring the height and age of dominant trees in even-aged stands found on that site (Skovsgaard and Vanclay 2008).”
Models for supporting forest management in a changing environment (2011, methodology): “These models primarily rely on the classical assumption of the stationarity of site conditions (Skovsgaard and Vanclay, 2008; Vanclay and Skovsgaard, 1997), and are often inadequate under conditions of a changing environment.”
Impact factor: outdated artefact or stepping-stone to journal certification? (2011, background): “At the time of writing (August 2011), WoS contained two records of a paper in Forestry by Skovsgaard and Vanclay (2008), both incorrect (Figure 6; correct pagination is 13-31).”
Forest Growth and Yield Modeling (2011, background): “This value is determined from stem number, quadratic mean diameter, and stand basal area (Skovsgaard and Vanclay, 2008).”