Self-feeding and chick provisioning diet differ in the common guillemot Uria aalge

By L. Wilson, F. Daunt, Sarah Wanless. 2004

86 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Causes and consequences of individual variability and specialization in foraging and migration strategies of seabirds (2017, background): “Alternatively, selection of high quality prey may reflect the need to maximise net energy gain per unit foraging effort for parents that are unable to carry more than one item in their bill (Wilson et al. 2004).”
Diet studies of seabirds: a review and recommendations (2007, background): “It has also proved difficult to use in some groups of seabird that do not regurgitate food to offspring, e.g. auks, though see Wilson et al. (2004).”
Recommended best practices for plastic and litter ingestion studies in marine birds: Collection, processing, and reporting (2019, background): “Lavage and emetics may be ineffective in some groups of seabirds, such as those that do not regurgitate food to offspring (e.g., auks, but see Wilson et al. 2004).”