Scheduled Sampling for Transformers
By Tsvetomila Mihaylova, André F. T. Martins. 2019
78 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Scheduled sampling is a technique for avoiding one of the known problems in sequence-to-sequence generation: exposure bias. It consists of feeding the model a mix of the teacher forced embeddings and the model predictions from the previous step in training time. The technique has been used for improving model performance with recurrent neural networks (RNN). In the Transformer model, unlike the RNN, the generation of a new word attends to the full sentence generated so far, not only to the last word, and it is not straightforward to apply the scheduled sampling technique. We propose some structural changes to allow scheduled sampling to be applied to Transformer architectures, via a two-pass decoding strategy. Experiments on two language pairs achieve performance close to a teacher-forcing baseline and show that this technique is promising for further exploration.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Model Architectures
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Hannaneh Hajishirzi
- Yejin Choi
- Jack Hessel
- Prithviraj Ammanabrolu
- Mohit Bansal
- Luke S. Zettlemoyer
- Rafet Sifa
- Christian Bauckhage
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Hannaneh Hajishirzi
- Yejin Choi
- Jack Hessel
- Prithviraj Ammanabrolu
- Kianté Brantley
- Christian Bauckhage
- Rafet Sifa
- Luc Van Gool
In Model Architectures
Citations in the corpus
- Is Reinforcement Learning (Not) for Natural Language Processing?: Benchmarks, Baselines, and Building Blocks for Natural Language Policy Optimization (2022, background): “Imitation learning for NLP. Algorithms such as Schedule Sampling (SS) (Bengio et al., 2015), Parallel SS (Duckworth et al., 2019), SS for Transformers (Mihaylova & Martins, 2019), Diffential SS (Goyal et al., 2017), LOLS (Lampouras & Vlachos, 2016; Chang et al., 2015), TextGAIL (Wu et al., 2021b), a”