Autonomous multi-floor indoor navigation with a computationally constrained MAV
By Shaojie Shen, Nathan Michael, Vijay R. Kumar. 2011
417 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Aerospace Engineering, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Aerospace Engineering
- Markus Achtelik
- Davide Scaramuzza
- Vijay R. Kumar
- Sergey Levine
- Shaojie Shen
- Roland Yves Siegwart
- Pieter Abbeel
- Nathan Michael
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Markus Achtelik
- Sergey Levine
- Luc Van Gool
- Jitendra Malik
- Marc Pollefeys
- Vladlen Koltun
- Xiaogang Wang
- Dacheng Tao
Citations in the corpus
- Self-Supervised Deep Reinforcement Learning with Generalized Computation Graphs for Robot Navigation (2017, methodology): “Although methods based on geometric reconstruction and mapping have proven effective in a range of navigation and collision avoidance domains [1], [2], [3], they impose considerable computational overhead [4] and”
- Toward a Fully Autonomous UAV: Research Platform for Indoor and Outdoor Urban Search and Rescue (2012, methodology): “This differs from other approaches, where either laser odometry [6] or monocular visual odometry [7] is used for pose estimation.”
- Collaborative mapping of an earthquake‐damaged building via ground and aerial robots (2012, methodology): “…but greater than 8 cm in either the x or y directions, the vehicle will enter a recovery phase in which it will attempt to regulate 1 cm above the desired landing location and concurrently estimate the changes in the dynamic model resulting from ground effects (as discussed in Shen et al. (2011)).”
- Stereo vision based indoor/outdoor navigation for flying robots (2013, methodology): “Shen et al. [6] also utilize a laser scanner for multi-floor navigation, but perform all computations including SLAM with loop closure on-board the MAV.”
- Vision-based state estimation for autonomous rotorcraft MAVs in complex environments (2013, methodology): “Indeed, in our previous work [1], we developed a state estimation method based on laser and IMU sensors to enable a MAV to fly autonomously in a structured indoor environment.”
- A robust and modular multi-sensor fusion approach applied to MAV navigation (2013, background): “Common fusion approaches are based on indirect formulations of Extended (EKF) [13], or Unscented (UKF) Kalman Filters [14].”
- Quadrotors and Accelerometers: State Estimation with an Improved Dynamic Model (2014, methodology): “In [2], a quadrotor system is presented that also uses a scanning laser range finder.”
- PIXHAWK: A micro aerial vehicle design for autonomous flight using onboard computer vision (2012, background): “Recent works successfully demonstrated the use of small LIDAR sensors on such small scale MAV’s for mapping and autonomous flight [13,27,8,30,2,11].”
- Real-time onboard visual-inertial state estimation and self-calibration of MAVs in unknown environments (2012, background): “However, many implementations still rely on artificial features [1] or heavier and costly sensors like laser scanners [2].”
- Vision-based autonomous mapping and exploration using a quadrotor MAV (2012, background): “Many researchers demonstrated some of these abilities by using laser range finders [2], [8], [22], artificial marker aided vision [9], [19] and/or a Vicon motion capture system [15].”
- Opportunities and challenges with autonomous micro aerial vehicles (2012, methodology): “These methods can also be used to determine the offsets in inertial measurement unit (IMU) readings and for online calibration (Shen et al., 2011b).”
- Towards a swarm of agile micro quadrotors (2012, background): “2kg gross weight, 0.75m diameter, and 5,400rpm nominal rotor speed at hover), consumes approximately 400W of power (Shen et al. 2011).”
- Visual Odometry and Mapping for Autonomous Flight Using an RGB-D Camera (2011, background): “Finally, there has been considerable work in using laser range finders for MAV navigation and control [13, 3, 11, 34] with the limitations discussed earlier in this paper.”
- Progress on ‘pico’ air vehicles (2012, result): “This is in contrast to ‘higher-level’ control problems of autonomous navigation (Shen et al., 2011) and coordination of multiple unmanned air vehicles (Stirling and Floreano, 2010).”