European map of alien plant invasions based on the quantitative assessment across habitats

By Milan Chytrý, Petr Pyšek, Jan Wild, Joan Pino, Lindsay C. Maskell, M. Vilà. 2009

298 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6b56fc21145b739d5fb60a4e81fd43672e233891

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. Petr Pyšek
2. D. Richardson
3. Jan Pergl
4. M. Vilà
5. P. Hulme
6. V. Jarošı́k
7. I. Kühn
8. Jane A. Catford

In Plant Science

1. Petr Pyšek
2. D. Richardson
3. P. Hulme
4. Jan Pergl
5. V. Jarošı́k
6. M. Vilà
7. I. Kühn
8. Milan Chytrý

Citations in the corpus

• Contrasting patterns in the invasions of European terrestrial and freshwater habitats by alien plants, insects and vertebrates (2010, background): “As shown previously for plants, knowledge of the occurrence of alien species in habitats provides a solid basis for spatially explicit risk assessment of biological invasions (Chytrý et al., 2008a, 2009).”
• Invasive Species, Environmental Change and Management, and Health (2010, background): “An invasion-risk map for Europe, which is based on levels of plant invasion in 33 habitat types (106), projects future invasions under a range of socioeconomic scenarios.”
• Invasive species in Europe: ecology, status, and policy (2011, background): “The most invaded habitats in Europe are in heavily transformed landscapes such as agricultural land, coniferous forests, urban areas, and dump or construction sites [57].”
• The 'dirty dozen': socio-economic factors amplify the invasion potential of 12 high-risk aquatic invasive species in Great Britain and Ireland. (2013, unknown): “woodlands (Chytry et al. 2009).”
• Catalogue of alien plants of the Czech Republic (3rd edition) (2022, background): “…as species invasiveness (Kubešová et al. 2010, Moravcová et al. 2010), associations with pollinators (Pyšek et al. 2011a), habitat invasibility (Chytrý et al. 2005, 2008a, 2009b, Sádlo et al. 2007), rates of spread and range filling (Williamson et al. 2005, 2009, Pyšek et al. 2011c),…”
• Accounting for multi‐scale spatial autocorrelation improves performance of invasive species distribution modelling (iSDM) (2012, background): “, 2006), but SAC has not been examined in invasive species distribution models (iSDMs), a special type of SDM that is increasingly being used to predict biological invasions and guide early detection (e.g. Lippitt et al., 2008; Meentemeyer et al., 2008; Chytrý et al., 2009).”
• Reproductive characteristics of neophytes in the Czech Republic: traits of invasive and non-invasive species. (2010, background): “…pan-European analyses of invasion patterns and policy recommendations resulting from European frameworkprogrammes projects on biological invasions (e.g. Chytrý et al. 2008b, 2009b, 2011, Hulme et al. 2008, 2009a, b, Pyšek et al. 2008b, 2010a, b, DAISIE 2009, Winter et al. 2009, Vilà et al. 2010).”
• Hotspots of plant invasion predicted by propagule pressure and ecosystem characteristics (2011, methodology): “Habitat type is a useful predictor in that it integrates factors like climate, geography and propagule pressure (Chytrý et al., 2009).”