Evaluation of community level interventions to address social and structural determinants of health: a cluster randomised controlled trial

By M. Wall, R. Hayes, Derek G. Moore, M. Petticrew, A. Clow, Elena Schmidt, A. Draper, K. Lock, R. Lynch, A. Renton. BMC Public Health, 2009

604 citations recorded by the source corpus.

BackgroundIn London and the rest of the UK, diseases associated with poor diet, inadequate physical activity and mental illness account for a large proportion of area based health inequality. There is a lack of evidence on interventions promoting healthier behaviours especially in marginalised populations, at a structural or ecological level and utilising a community development approach.The Well London project financed by the Big Lottery 'Wellbeing' Fund and implemented by a consortium of London based agencies led by the Greater London Authority and the London Health Commission is implementing a set of complex interventions across 20 deprived areas of London. The interventions focus on healthy eating, healthy physical activity and mental health and wellbeing and are designed and executed with community participation complementing existing facilities and services.Methods/DesignThe programme will be evaluated through a cluster randomised controlled trial. Forty areas across London were chosen based on deprivation scores. Areas were characterised by high proportion of Black and Minority Ethnic residents, worklessness, ill-health and poor physical environments. Twenty areas were randomly assigned to the intervention arm of Well London project and twenty 'matched' areas assigned as controls. Measures of physical activity, diet and mental health are collected at start and end of the project and compared to assess impact.The quantitative element will be complemented by a longitudinal qualitative study elucidating pathways of influence between intervention activities and health outcomes. A related element of the study investigates the health-related aspects of the structural and ecological characteristics of the project areas. The project 'process' will also be evaluated.DiscussionThe size of the project and the fact that the interventions are 'complex' in the sense that firstly, there are a number of interacting components with a wide range of groups and organisational levels targeted by the intervention, and secondly, a degree of flexibility or tailoring of the intervention, makes this trial potentially very useful in providing evidence of the types of activities that can be used to address chronic health problems in communities suffering from multiple deprivation.Trial RegistrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN68175121

Subfields: General Health Professions, Health, Physiology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a088a085bc18b47615c49846f73219aed42d59fd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Allotment gardening and health: a comparative survey among allotment gardeners and their neighbors without an allotment (2010, background): “Health complaints [0-37] 4.”
Extinction of experience: the loss of human–nature interactions (2016, positive): “…exposure to natural environments is a necessary ingredient for a healthy life (the so- called “vitamin G”, in which the G represents greenspace), and can in some instances be equally as effective as more conventional forms of medical treatment (Groenewegen et al. 2006 ; Shanahan et al. 2015 ).”
The value of Twitter data for determining the emotional responses of people to urban green spaces: A case study and critical evaluation (2019, result): “In contrast to a number of previous studies which have suggested urban green space as a remediation to stress and related emotions such as anger (Groenewegen et al., 2006; Tyrvainen et al., 2013), this study identified a number of angry tweet responses to urban green spaces.”