The economic burden of physical inactivity: a global analysis of major non-communicable diseases.
By D. Ding, K. Lawson, T. Kolbe-Alexander, E. Finkelstein, P. Katzmarzyk, W. van Mechelen, M. Pratt. The Lancet, 2016
1,752 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Physiology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6b4d57fa96110f517af4810ebc7f0915d1af5bd6
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
In Physiology
Citations in the corpus
- Self-regulation in childhood as a predictor of future outcomes: A meta-analytic review. (2020, background): “Given the importance of healthy living for non-communicable disease (Ding et al., 2016; Lee et al., 2012), self-regulation might relate to symptoms of physical illness through the mediating process of healthy or unhealthy living.”
- A tale of two pandemics: How will COVID-19 and global trends in physical inactivity and sedentary behavior affect one another? (2020, neutral): “7 et al.”
- Consequences of physical inactivity in older adults: A systematic review of reviews and meta‐analyses (2020, methodology): “Data extraction Two investigators (MT and CC) independently reviewed all selected full-text articles using a structured data extraction form that included: (1) search strategies; (2) inclusion criteria; (3) physical activity measure(s) used; (4) the effect size(s) reported in the review; (5) study d”
- Defining Physical Literacy for Application in Australia: A Modified Delphi Method (2019, background): “The total economic cost of inactivity is estimated to be U.S. $67.5 billion globally (Ding et al., 2016).”