Goal-directed resuscitation for patients with early septic shock.

By S. Peake, A. Delaney, M. Bailey, R. Bellomo, P. Cameron, D. J. Cooper, A. Higgins, A. Holdgate, B. Howe, S. Webb and 1 more. New England Journal of Medicine, 2014

1,849 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Epidemiology, Physiology, Surgery

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6b3f6347aff9a103d873164f173f01e427d40b00

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Epidemiology

1. Claudio Ronco
2. John A. Kellum
3. Sean M. Bagshaw
4. R. Bellomo
5. A. Rhodes
6. Laura Evans
7. M. Cecconi
8. Janice L. Zimmerman

In Surgery

1. R. Bellomo
2. Claudio Ronco
3. Sean M. Bagshaw
4. John A. Kellum

Citations in the corpus

• Acute kidney injury in sepsis (2017, methodology): “The ProMISe [51], ProCESS [52], and ARISE trials [53] demonstrated no difference in mortality or improved renal outcomes with EGDT.”
• Sepsis and septic shock. (2018, background): “80,82 It is likely that improved recognition and early intervention has contributed to the observed decrease in mortality.”
• Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016 (2017, methodology): “The EGDT group received transfusion at a hematocrit 30% (hemoglobin 10 g/dL) when the Scvo 2 was 70% after initial resuscitation interventions compared to the protocol-based standard care group that received blood transfusion only when the hemoglobin was 7.5 g/dL.”