Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango).
By C. Charles, A. Gafni, T. Whelan. 1997
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Anne M. Stiggelbout
- M. Afnan
- Arwen H. Pieterse
- C. Rudin
- J. D. Haes
- R. Adekpedjou
- Vincent Conitzer
- Masoud Afnan
Citations in the corpus
- Ethical Implementation of Artificial Intelligence to Select Embryos in In Vitro Fertilization (2021, background): “shared decision-making where this power and informational asymmetry is reduced to the benefit of patient autonomy [34].”
- Establishing joint decisions in a dyad (2012, background): “In other words, when making a proposal, a person suggests that at least one person other than the proposer him/herself has the right and obligation to be involved in the decision-making process (Charles et al., 1997).”
- Interventions for increasing the use of shared decision making by healthcare professionals. (2018, background): “Briefly, SDM depends on knowing and understanding the best available evidence about the risks and benefits across all available options while ensuring that the patient’s values and preferences are taken into account (Charles 1997; Elwyn 1999; Towle 1999).”
- The applications of PROs in clinical practice: what are they, do they work, and why? (2009, background): “Recent policy in both the US and UK has emphasised the importance of patient self management and patient involvement in care [23] based on the notions of patientcentred care [24, 25] and shared decision making [26].”
- Shared decision making: Concepts, evidence, and practice. (2015, background): “” [2] They described an important aspect that distinguishes SDM from previous models of treatment decision making, the two-way exchange of not only information but also treatment preferences.”
- Computer knows best? The need for value-flexibility in medical AI (2018, unknown): “25 26 It is seen as a well-justified combination of physician responsibility and patient autonomy, avoiding the extremes of either medical paternalism or giving patients sole decision-making power.”