Stochastic finite element: a non intrusive approach by regression
By Marc Berveiller, Bruno Sudret, Maurice Lemaire. 2006
456 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Civil and Structural Engineering, Environmental Engineering, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6b296c15de06abeef97cdd06b0cc4bea6a28ca55
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Civil and Structural Engineering
- Anthony Nouy
- Xiaoying Zhuang
- Bruno Sudret
- Timon Rabczuk
- George Stefanou
- Géraud Blatman
- A. Clément
- V. Dubourg
In Environmental Engineering
- Bruno Sudret
- Anthony Nouy
- George Stefanou
- Géraud Blatman
- B. Ataie‐Ashtiani
- Craig T. Simmons
- M. Rajabi
- Jean-Marc Bourinet
In Statistics and Probability
- Anthony Nouy
- George Stefanou
- Bruno Sudret
- A. Clément
- Géraud Blatman
- Sondipon Adhikari
- V. Dubourg
- B. Ataie‐Ashtiani
Citations in the corpus
- Global sensitivity analysis using polynomial chaos expansions (2008, methodology): “Alternatively, non intrusive methods have been recently proposed (Field, 2002; Ghiocel and Ghanem, 2002; Choi et al., 2004; Berveiller et al., 2006).”
- Polynomial chaos expansions for uncertainty propagation and moment independent sensitivity analysis of seawater intrusion simulations (2015, methodology): “…methods (Ghiocel and Ghanem, 2002; Le Maitre et al., 2002), stochastic or probabilistic collocation methods (Xiu and Hesthaven, 2005), gradient-based methods also known as collocation methods coupled with sensitivity derivatives (Perez, 2008), and regression methods (Berveiller et al., 2006).”
- Recent Developments in Spectral Stochastic Methods for the Numerical Solution of Stochastic Partial Differential Equations (2009, methodology): “Regression Regression methods [15, 27, 28, 123] rely on the same principles as classical response surface methods [62].”
- The stochastic finite element method: Past, present and future (2009, methodology): “Thus, this method can be considered as a polynomial response surface approach in which the coefficients are calculated using the Galerkin method [15].”
- Polynomial-Chaos-based Kriging (2015, unknown): “This pio-neering approach called spectral stochastic finite element method (SSFEM), was later developed by Xiu and Karniadakis (2002); Sudret et al. (2004); Wan and Karniadakis (2005, 2006); Berveiller et al. (2006a), among others.”
- Stochastic analysis of the fracture toughness of polymeric nanoparticle composites using polynomial chaos expansions (2017, methodology): “From various non-intrusive methods, the regression method in Berveiller et al. (2006), Choi et al. (2004), Sudret (2008) is exploited in this study.”
- A generalized spectral decomposition technique to solve a class of linear stochastic partial differential equations (2007, unknown): “Non-intrusive techniques, such as Monte-Carlo simulation [1,2], response surface method, projection [3] or regression [4] methods, have the great advantage that they only require the use of a simple deterministic calculation code.”
- Reliability-based design optimization using kriging surrogates and subset simulation (2011, methodology): “Various surrogates have been used in the structural reliability literature out of which: polynomial response surfaces (Faravelli, 1989; Bucher and Bourgund, 1990; Kim and Na, 1997; Das and Zheng, 2000), polynomial chaos expansions (Sudret and Der Kiureghian, 2002; Berveiller et al., 2006; Blatman an”
- Adaptive sparse polynomial chaos expansion based on least angle regression (2011, methodology): “Two approaches based on a PC representation of the response are usually distinguished: – the projection approach: each PC coefficient is recast as a multidimensional integral [7, 8] which can be computed either by simulation or quadrature; – the regression approach [9, 10, 11, 12]: the PC coefficien”