Co-benefits of climate policy—lessons learned from a study in Shanxi, China

By K. Aunan, Jinghua Fang, H. Vennemo, K. Oye, H. Seip. 2004

196 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, General Health Professions, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6b1d0974fcd9f2d0ce3b10fcbd36d77180c722fb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. S. Paltsev
2. J. Reilly
3. V. Karplus
4. Onno Kuik
5. Reyer Gerlagh

In Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

1. S. Paltsev
2. Noelle E. Selin

Citations in the corpus

• Climate policy co-benefits: a review (2020, unknown): “…policy) stands out among explanations (Alam, Hyde, Duffy, & McNabola, 2018; Antwi-Agyei, Dougill, Agyekum, & Stringer, 2018; Apsimon et al., 2009; Aunan et al., 2004; Cifuentes et al., 2001; Jiang et al., 2013; Kok, Metz, Verhagen, & van Rooijen, 2008; Mendez, 2015; Thambiran & Diab, 2011a;…”
• Health damages from air pollution in China. (2012, background): “For this reason, most studies analyzing air pollution in China have excluded ozone from their analysis (e.g., World Bank, 1997; Ho et al., 2002; Aunan et al., 2004; World Bank and SEPA, 2007).”
• Air quality co-benefits of carbon pricing in China (2018, background): “Each ratio in equation (1) is governed by nonlinear, interacting processes.”