Social Networks and the Identification of Peer Effects
By Paul Goldsmith-Pinkham, Guido W. Imbens. 2013
409 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Sociology and Political Science
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- The State of Applied Econometrics - Causality and Policy Evaluation (2016, neutral): “A seminal paper in the econometric literature is Manski’s linear-in-means model (Manski [1993], Bramoullé and Fortin [2009], Goldsmith-Pinkham and Imbens [2013]).”
- Dynamic Spatial Panel Models: Networks, Common Shocks, and Sequential Exogeneity (2018, methodology): “In particular, (32) implies that linear and quadratic moments are uncorrelated, while (33) implies that the linear quadratic forms are uncorrelated over time.”
- Identification and Estimation of Spillover Effects in Randomized Experiments (2017, background): “Another body of research has analyzed causal inference under interference from a designbased perspective in which potential outcomes are fixed and all randomness is due to the (known) treatment assignment mechanism (see Tchetgen Tchetgen and VanderWeele, 2012; Ogburn and VanderWeele, 2014; Halloran ”
- Econometrics of Network Formation (2016, methodology): “This approach has been taken in Goldsmith-Pinkham and Imbens (2013), Boucher and Mourifié (2012), and Leung (2014).”
- Heterogeneous peer effects in education (2014, neutral): “b∞ = lim →∞ P b = ⎜⎝ 13 = 0333 49 = 0444 29 = 0222 ⎟⎠ (26)”