Mark-to-Market Accounting and Liquidity Pricing

By Franklin Allen, Elena Carletti. 2008

476 citations recorded by the source corpus.

When liquidity plays an important role as in times of financial crisis, asset prices in some markets may reflect the amount of liquidity available in the market rather than the future earning power of the asset. Mark-to-market accounting is not a desirable way to assess the solvency of a financial institution in such circumstances. We show that a shock in the insurance sector can cause the current value of banks' assets to be less than the current value of their liabilities so the banks are insolvent. In contrast, if historic cost accounting is used, banks are allowed to continue and can meet all their future liabilities. Mark-to-market accounting can thus lead to contagion where none would occur with historic cost accounting.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Finance

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6aef9f449f2247a14ec306bf1aaafd237e824ed2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

  1. Franklin Allen
  2. Elena Carletti
  3. Markus K. Brunnermeier
  4. Anjan V. Thakor
  5. Hyun Song Shin
  6. Douglas Gale
  7. Christian Leuz
  8. Christian Laux

In Finance

  1. Elena Carletti
  2. Franklin Allen
  3. Markus K. Brunnermeier
  4. Christian Leuz
  5. Hyun Song Shin
  6. Anjan V. Thakor
  7. Douglas Gale
  8. Christian Laux

Citations in the corpus