Perinatal outcome of singletons and twins after assisted conception: a systematic review of controlled studies

By F. Helmerhorst, D. Perquin, Diane Donker, M. Keirse. British medical journal, 2004

1,109 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Epidemiology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Reproductive Medicine

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6ad603a37aeeda0ed0027c561134f785ea48df8e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. S. Pandey
2. V. Söderström-Anttila
3. C. Bergh
4. M. Hamilton
5. L. Romundstad
6. S. Bhattacharya
7. A. Shetty
8. K. Nygren

Citations in the corpus

• Why do singletons conceived after assisted reproduction technology have adverse perinatal outcome? Systematic review and meta-analysis. (2013, background): “However, eSET is not the only solution to the adverse perinatal outcome in IVF children, as growing evidence has shown that ART singletons also have a higher risk of PTB, low-birthweight (LBW), being small for gestational age (SGA), and an increased rate of congenital malformations and cerebral pals”
• Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from IVF/ICSI: a systematic review and meta-analysis. (2012, methodology): “........................................................................................................................... Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from IVF/ICSI: a systematic review and meta-analysis Shilpi Pandey1, Ashalatha Shetty2, Mark Hamilton1, Sila”