Comparison of different modeling approaches for thermoelectric elements

By G. Fraisse, J. Ramousse, D. Sgorlon, C. Goupil. 2013

228 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Civil and Structural Engineering, Materials Chemistry

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6ab7781940a7b72b92c7c266731273ea1dccd28b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Civil and Structural Engineering

1. Bo Li
2. Jie Zhu
3. Dongliang Zhao
4. Yuying Yan
5. Ssennoga Twaha
6. Gang Tan

In Materials Chemistry

1. Bo Li
2. Jie Zhu
3. Dongliang Zhao
4. Yuying Yan
5. Ssennoga Twaha
6. Gang Tan

Citations in the corpus

• A review of thermoelectric cooling: Materials, modeling and applications (2014, methodology): “[29] presented a comparison study for four different modeling approaches applied for thermoelement, including standard simplified models, analytical models, model based on electrical analogy between heat transfer and electricity [36], and numerical models based on the finite element method (FEM).”
• A comprehensive review of thermoelectric technology: materials, applications, modelling and performance improvement (2016, background): “For example in one instance the Seebeck effect is kept constant, rendering the Thomson effect zero or negligible [85].”
• Comparison and parameter optimization of a two-stage thermoelectric generator using high temperature exhaust of internal combustion engine (2014, background): “Most studies on the TEG system have focused on model optimization [11–17], geometric parameter of thermocouple [18–20], heat exchanger [21,22], material [23,24], and new TEG structure [25,26].”