Community‐level consequences of a plant invasion: effects on three habitats in coastal california

By M. .. Alvarez, J. Cushman. 2002

177 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6aac8cb3361627b260bb6d2042fd658143cd1c8c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. Petr Pyšek
2. D. Richardson
3. I. Kowarik
4. M. Hejda
5. K. Clay
6. S. Luke Flory
7. Mirijam Gaertner
8. A. Tye

In Insect Science

1. Petr Pyšek
2. D. Richardson
3. K. Clay
4. M. Hejda
5. I. Kowarik
6. Mirijam Gaertner
7. S. Luke Flory
8. S. Jacobs

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. Petr Pyšek
2. D. Richardson
3. Mirijam Gaertner
4. M. Hejda
5. I. Kowarik
6. K. Clay
7. S. Luke Flory
8. S. Jacobs

Citations in the corpus

• Eucalyptus invasions in riparian forests: Effects on native vegetation community diversity, stand structure and composition (2013, result): “camaldulensis, and this finding concurs with that of Alvarez and Cushman (2002) who reported a similar effect with the invasive climber Delairea odorata in coastal California.”
• Tree invasion in naturally treeless environments: impacts of quinine (Cinchona pubescens) trees on native vegetation in Galápagos. (2007, background): “Within the same region, an introduced species may evoke varying responses in different plant communities, but comparative studies at the community level are surprisingly rare (Alvarez and Cushman, 2002).”
• Assessing the residual effects of Carpobrotus edulis invasion, implications for restoration (2009, background): “It is becoming more accepted that some invasive species, such as C. edulis, may actually change ecosystem function, acting as ‘‘ecosystem engineers’’ (Alvarez 1999; Alvarez and Cushman 2002; Hobbs and Humphries 1995; Mack and D’Antonio 2003; Vitousek and Walker 1989; Walker and Vitousek 1991).”
• Effect of Invasive Plant Species on Temperate Wetland Plant Diversity (2004, background): “The evidence for the negative effects of introduced competitors on species richness is much less convincing, although there is some evidence of invasive effects in woodlands (Franks 2002) and grasslands (Meiners et al. 2001; Alvarez & Cushman 2002).”
• Patterns of environmental change associated withTypha xglauca invasion in a Great Lakes coastal wetland (2009, methodology): “Invaded plots are compared against uninvaded plots, which are viewed as representing typical pre–invasion conditions (Pyšek and Pyšek 1995, Alvarez and Cushman 2002).”
• Temporal Changes in Native and Exotic Vegetation and Soil Characteristics following Disturbances by Feral Pigs in a California Grassland (2006, methodology): “As discussed at length by Scheiner (2001), this approach is an effective method for dealing with potential correlations among multiple dependent variables (see Alvarez and Cushman 2002 and Cushman et al. 2004).”
• Field‐based competitive impacts between invaders and natives at varying resource supply (2008, unknown): “1998; Alvarez & Cushman 2002).”
• Impacts of Garlic Mustard Invasion on a Forest Understory Community (2007, background): “Although it is often assumed that exotic plant species alter the structure and biodiversity of the resident communities they invade, we know surprisingly little about their effects on native flora (e.g., Alvarez and Cushman 2002).”
• Diversity declines in Microstegium vimineum (Japanese stiltgrass) patches (2009, background): “Uninvaded areas are frequently used as control plots (Kotanen, 1997; Alvarez and Cushman, 2002; Ortega and Pearson, 2005); however, paired plots that are immediately adjacent to each other located at multiple sites separated by several kilometers is an uncommon but advantageous design (Chabrerie et…”
• What is the impact of Impatiens glandulifera on species diversity of invaded riparian vegetation (2006, methodology): “The space for time substitution approach, often used in studies on vegetation succession (Prach et al., 1997, 2001; Alvarez and Cushman, 2002; Badano and Pugnaire, 2004; Ruprecht, 2005), was therefore justified and the uninvaded plots can be viewed as representing the resident vegetation before th”
• Biological consequences of invasion by reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea) (2009, background): “…limitations, simultaneous, multi-approach studies are increasingly preferred to provide the most comprehensive account of an invaders impacts possible (e.g., Alvarez and Cushman 2002; Brandon et al. 2004; Hejda and Pysek 2006; Reinhart et al. 2005; Stohlgren et al. 2008; Truscotta et al. 2008).”
• Invasive plant removal method determines native plant community responses (2009, methodology): “In addition to the direct application of restoring invaded communities, invasive plant removal experiments provide information on the effects of the invader on native communities (Gould & Gorchov 2000; Alvarez & Cushman 2002; Diaz et al. 2003).”
• When does invasive species removal lead to ecological recovery? Implications for management success (2018, background): “…of Agriculture Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Asheville, NC 28804-3454, USA 2003; Vredenburg 2004), altering native biodiversity (Alvarez and Cushman 2002; Clavero and GarciaBerthou 2005; Powell et al. 2011), influencing ecosystem processes (Vitousek and Walker 1989; Lovett et…”