Formation of Globular Clusters in Hierarchical Cosmology

By Andrey V. Kravtsov, O. Gnedin. 2003

270 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We study the formation of globular clusters in a Milky Way-size galaxy using a high-resolution cosmological simulation. The clusters in our model form in the strongly baryon-dominated cores of supergiant molecular clouds in the gaseous disks of high-redshift galaxies. The properties of clusters are estimated using a physically motivated subgrid model of the isothermal cloud collapse. The first clusters in the simulation form at z ≈ 12, while we conjecture that the best conditions for globular cluster formation appear to be at z ~ 3-5. Most clusters form in the progenitor galaxies of the virial mass Mh > 109 M☉, and the total mass of the cluster population is strongly correlated with the mass of its host galaxy: MGC = 3 × 106 M☉(Mh/1011 M☉)1.1. This corresponds to a fraction ~2 × 10-4 of the galactic baryons being in the form of globular clusters. In addition, the mass of the globular cluster population and the maximum cluster mass in a given region strongly correlate with the local average star formation rate. We find that the mass, size, and metallicity distributions of the globular cluster population identified in the simulation are remarkably similar to the corresponding distributions of the Milky Way globular clusters. We find no clear mass-metallicity or age-metallicity correlations for the old clusters. The zero-age mass function of globular clusters can be approximated by a power law dN/dM ∝ M-α with α ≈ 2, in agreement with the mass function of young stellar clusters in starbursting galaxies. We discuss in detail the origin and universality of the globular cluster mass function. Our results indicate that globular clusters with properties similar to those of observed clusters can form naturally within dense gaseous disks at z ≳ 3 in the concordance ΛCDM cosmology.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6aa81f521724787f2491e878774ee56a1174b6e2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. P. Hopkins
  2. A. Dekel
  3. L. Hernquist
  4. Volker Springel
  5. Andrey V. Kravtsov
  6. R. Dav'e
  7. James S. Bullock
  8. Simon D. M. White

Citations in the corpus