A review of quartz optically stimulated luminescence characteristics and their relevance in single-aliquot regeneration dating protocols

By A. Wintle, A. Murray. 2006

1,861 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Atmospheric Science, Paleontology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6aa18b09407ee6483bb8590165df0667d95b9522

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

1. Z. Jacobs
2. R. Roberts
3. A. Cunningham
4. Bo Li
5. J. Wallinga
6. E. Rhodes
7. Sheng-Hua Li
8. K. Thomsen

In Atmospheric Science

1. Z. Jacobs
2. Bo Li
3. R. Roberts
4. A. Cunningham
5. Sheng-Hua Li
6. J. Wallinga
7. E. Rhodes
8. M. Jain

In Paleontology

1. Z. Jacobs
2. Bo Li
3. R. Roberts
4. A. Cunningham
5. E. Rhodes
6. J. Wallinga
7. Sheng-Hua Li
8. N. Jankowski

Citations in the corpus

• Optically Stimulated Luminescence Dating of Sediments over the Past 200,000 Years (2011, background): “A more substantive test of the basic SAR assumptions is the dose recovery test (Wintle & Murray 2006).”
• Selection of integration time intervals for quartz OSL decay curves (2010, background): “The ‘fast’ component has been identified as themost suitable for dating, as it is stable on geological timescales, rapidly bleached by sunlight, and less susceptible to thermal transfer of charge (Wintle and Murray, 2006).”
• Assessing the error on equivalent dose estimates derived from single aliquot regenerative dose measurements (2007, neutral): “Wintle and Murray (2006) recommend that the method only be used when R N is less than 85% of I Max (Eqn.”
• Stability of IRSL signals from sedimentary K-feldspar samples (2011, background): “From a dosimetric perspective, all the D0 values from the various approaches to measurement of the more stable signal are still much larger than those typical for quartz ( Wintle and Murray, 2006 ), and the advantages of using this more stable feldspar signal are still significant.”
• Optical dating in archaeology: thirty years in retrospect and grand challenges for the future (2015, methodology): “1a and 1b), so it is the component of choice for sediment dating (Bailey et al., 1997; Galbraith et al., 245 1999; Wintle and Murray, 2006).”
• Review and assessment of the potential of post-IR IRSL dating methods to circumvent the problem of anomalous fading in feldspar luminescence (2014, methodology): “Wintle and Murray (2006) suggested that a value of 2D0 could be taken as an conservative upper limit for dose measurement for quartz, but Li and Li (2012a) found that a reliable De beyond 2D0 can also be obtained using MET-pIRIR signal from Chinese loess samples — e.g., De values up to 1000 Gy were…”
• Mathematical model quantifies multiple daylight exposure and burial events for rock surfaces using luminescence dating (2015, background): “4 and 5) and D0 is a sample-dependent constant, characterizing the filling rate of the electron traps (Wintle and Murray, 2006).”