Factors influencing home range and activity of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in a Mediterranean coastal area

166 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Responding to spatial and temporal variations in predation risk: space use of a game species in a changing landscape of fear (2009, background): “1995) and annual home-range sizes remained quite small relative to daily movement capacities (see Results; for males see also Boitani et al. 1994; Massei et al. 1997; for an exhaustive review on females see Keuling et al. 2008a).”
Do intensive drive hunts affect wild boar (Sus scrofa) spatial behaviour in Italy? Some evidences and management implications (2010, background): “Wild boar home range size is mainly affected by sex, the availability of food and population density (Wood and Brenneman 1980; Singer et al. 1981; Boitani et al. 1994; Maillard 1996; Massei et al. 1997).”
Towards understanding wild boar Sus scrofa movement: a synthetic movement ecology approach (2014, background): “The densitydependent hypothesis predicts smaller home ranges (Massei et al. 1997) and increased activity (Andrzejewski & Jezierski 1978) when population size increases.”
Annual and seasonal space use of different age classes of female wild boar Sus scrofa L. (2008, background): “…annual home ranges of female wild boar (Janeau and Spitz 1984; Boitani et al. 1994; Massei et al. 1997; Baubet 1998; Hahn and Eisfeld 1998), and defined periods, especially of biological importance, were rarely considered (but see Douaud 1983 in Gerard and Campan 1988; Massei et al. 1997).”