Thermal and Fragmentation Properties of Star-forming Clouds in Low-Metallicity Environments

By K. Omukai, T. Tsuribe, R. Schneider, A. Ferrara. 2005

374 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The thermal and chemical evolution of star-forming clouds is studied for different gas metallicities, Z, using the model of Omukai, updated to include deuterium chemistry and the effects of cosmic microwave background (CMB) radiation. HD-line cooling dominates the thermal balance of clouds when Z ~ 10-5 to 10-3 Z☉ and density ≈105 cm-3. Early on, CMB radiation prevents the gas temperature from falling below TCMB, although this hardly alters the cloud thermal evolution in low-metallicity gas. From the derived temperature evolution, we assess cloud/core fragmentation as a function of metallicity from linear perturbation theory, which requires that the core elongation ℰ ≡ (b - a)/a > ℰNL ~ 1, where a (b) is the short (long) core axis length. The fragment mass is given by the thermal Jeans mass at ℰ = ℰNL. Given these assumptions and the initial (Gaussian) distribution of ℰ, we compute the fragment mass distribution as a function of metallicity. We find that (1) for Z = 0, all fragments are very massive, ≲103 M☉, consistent with previous studies; (2) for Z > 10-6 Z☉ a few clumps go through an additional high-density (≳1010 cm-3) fragmentation phase driven by dust cooling, leading to low-mass fragments; (3) the mass fraction in low-mass fragments is initially very small, but at Z ~ 10-5 Z☉ it becomes dominant and continues to grow as Z is increased; (4) as a result of the two fragmentation modes, a bimodal mass distribution emerges in 0.01 < Z/Z☉ < 0.1; and (5) for ≳0.1 Z☉, the two peaks merge into a single-peaked mass function, which might be regarded as the precursor of the ordinary Salpeter-like initial mass function.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6a8dc15933d3d75146b39763581b2ee1784be0c7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. P. Hopkins
  2. S. Glover
  3. Ralf Klessen
  4. L. Hernquist
  5. Christoph Federrath
  6. Tom Abel
  7. Volker Bromm
  8. John H. Wise

Citations in the corpus