Monitoring of biological diversity in space and time

By N. Yoccoz, James D. Nichols, T. Boulinier. 2001

1,385 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Economics and Econometrics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6a8da62b94761fb2b11738ded135103f956291a3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Economics and Econometrics

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Conservation and restoration of plant–animal mutualisms on oceanic islands (2010, methodology): “Mutualistic interactions as biodiversity monitoring tools The conventional methods of biodiversity monitoring focus on species numbers and population sizes (e.g. Yoccoz et al., 2001; and restoration of plant–animal mutualisms on oceanic islands.”
Habitat monitoring in Europe: a description of current practices (2008, neutral): “There have been several concerns over the current practices in biodiversity monitoring due to lack of a general, hypothesis-testing framework (Yoccoz et al. 2001; Balmford et al. 2003), and inadequacy of sampling design and eVort (Di Stefano 2001), which result in a poor ability of monitoring…”
The concept of overgrazing and its role in management of large herbivores (2006, background): “Monitoring requires that management has clear objectives, formulates explicit hypotheses about patterns and processes, and chooses a design of monitoring reflecting this (Yoccoz et al. 2001).”
WHAT ARE THE ISSUES WITH PRESENCE–ABSENCE DATA FOR WILDLIFE MANAGERS? (2005, background): “The first is the why, what, and how of the intended study/monitoring program (Yoccoz et al. 2001, MacKenzie and Royle 2005).”
Predicting species distributions from checklist data using site‐occupancy models (2010, background): “Most species present at a site are not always detected during sampling (Yoccoz et al., 2001; Kéry, 2002; Williams et al., 2002).”
Common birds facing global changes: what makes a species at risk? (2004, background): “However, the value of surveys may be considerably increased when the fates of different groups based on a priori hypothesis are compared (Yoccoz et al., 2001).”
Accounting for uncertainty when mapping species distributions: The need for maps of ignorance (2011, background): “…on all target species due to differences in detectability, insufficient sampling effort, inadequacy of sampling techniques, geographic (i.e. positional) inaccuracy and collection bias (see Hortal and Lobo, 2005; Pellet and Schmidt, 2005; Soberón and Peterson, 2004; Yoccoz et al., 2001).”
Long-term effects of experimental forest harvesting on abundance and reproductive demography of terrestrial salamanders (2009, methodology): “We continued to utilize relative abundance indices to provide continuity with prior data collection on EUs (Harpole and Haas, 1999; Knapp et al., 2003), and we assume that expected capture probabilities were approximately equal across all EUs, years, and species complexes ( Yoccoz et al., 2001; Pol”
Building capacity in biodiversity monitoring at the global scale (2017, background): “These are crucial points and often lead to controversy about the effectiveness and advantages of PMNs (Danielsen et al. 2003, 2005, 2006; Schmeller et al. 2009, 2012a; Yoccoz et al. 2001, 2003).”
Monitoring distributions using call surveys: estimating site occupancy, detection probabilities and inferring absence. (2005, background): “They should provide good quality data and allow the inference they were designed for (Yoccoz et al., 2001; Pollock et al., 2002; Kéry and Schmid, 2004).”
Adaptive harvest management of North American waterfowl populations: a brief history and future prospects (2007, background): “ponent of these larger processes (Yoccoz et al. 2001; Nichols and Williams 2006).”