Does Social Security Privatization Produce Efficiency Gains
By Shin’ichi Nishiyama, Kent A. Smetters. 2005
235 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Demography, General Health Professions
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6a86062927403ccd5c2ef8b3232618197d90d36b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
In Demography
In General Health Professions
Citations in the corpus
- Pension Funding and Individual Accounts in Economies with Life-Cyclers and Myopes (2010, methodology): “In order to asses the aggregate efficiency consequences, we introduce a Lump-Sum Redistribution Authority (LSRA) in the spirit of Auerbach and Kotlikoff (1987, 62f.) as well as Nishiyama and Smetters (2005, 2007), Fehr and Habermann (2008a) and Fehr et al. (2008) in a separate simulation.”
- How Well Does the U.S. Social Insurance System Provide Social Insurance? (2010, background): “Allocations in have the property that the present value of con-usl Gj sumption is no more than the present value of labor earnings less net 4 The utility is defined only for .”
- Heterogeneity and Government Revenues: Higher Taxes at the Top? (2014, background): “Among others, Huggett and Ventura (1998), Conesa and Krueger (1999) and Nishiyama and Smetters (2007) used it to quantify the effects of social security reform with heterogenous households.”
- Sustainable Social Security: Four Options (2014, unknown): “Section 2 presents the model 2See, for example, Conesa and Krueger (1999), De Nardi et al. (1999), Kotlikoff et al. (1999), Altig et al. (2001), Kotlikoff et al. (2007), Nishiyama and Smetters (2007) and Attanasio et al. (2007).”
- Risk Sharing and Efficiency Implications of Progressive Pension Arrangements (2008, methodology): “In the bottom part we follow Nishiyama and Smetters (2007) and assume that transitory shocks are reduced to half of their previous values.12 At first glance, an increased progressivity of the pension system would now be expected to produce lower aggregate efficiency gains.”