Predicting opposition to the civil rights of trans persons in the United Kingdom

By N. Tee, Peter V. Hegarty. 2006

174 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Reproductive Medicine, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6a8276492502be545a0dc631780be48129378fbe

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Reproductive Medicine

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Development of the heteronormative attitudes and beliefs scale (2015, methodology): “As indicated in Table 1, which summarises the two-factor solution described in the results section below, several items pertaining to binary and essential beliefs about gender and sex were adapted from Tee and Hegarty (2006).”
Transpeople, Transprejudice and Pathologization: A Seven-Country Factor Analytic Study (2009, background): “It is evident in autobiographies (e.g. Green, 2004, writing in the US; Morris, 1974, in the UK; Rees, 1996, in the UK), biographical accounts (e.g.”
Heterosexuals’ Attitudes Toward Transgender People: Findings from a National Probability Sample of U.S. Adults (2013, background): “Tee and Hegarty (2006) found that having prior contact with gay men and lesbians was an even more powerful predictor of support for the legal rights of transsexuals than was prior contact with gender minorities.”
Cisgenderism in psychology: pathologising and misgendering children from 1999 to 2008 (2012, background): “In ‘transphobia’ research, violence and discrimination against people with self-designated genders are typically attributed to negative attitudes towards people with ‘transgender identity’, and this literature relies heavily on categorical notions like ‘the transgender community’, ‘transgender peopl”
There’s More Than Meets the Eye: Facial Appearance and Evaluations of Transsexual People (2010, background): “Men’s general and attractiveness/relationship evaluations and transphobia scores were more negative than women’s, confirming other research on attitudes toward transpeople (Antoszewski et al. 2007; Ceglian and Lyons 2004; Claman 2007; Hill and Willoughby 2005; Landén and Innala 2000; Leitenberg and ”
Measuring Hong Kong Undergraduate Students’ Attitudes Towards Transpeople (2008, background): “Transphobia is linked to heterosexism, authoritarianism, essentialist views of sex (Tee and Hegarty 2006), gendertyping (Ceglian and Lyons 2004), tolerance for gender nonconformity in children, and perhaps unsurprising, attitudes towards homosexuals (Hill and Willoughby 2005).”
Defending the Sex/Gender Binary: The Role of Gender Identification and Need for Closure (2020, background): “Binary views of gender (Tee & Hegarty, 2006) 9 1 ( strongly disagree ) to 7 ( strongly agree ) .87 There are only two genders, male and female Gender stereotyping (adapted from Jetten et al., 1997) 5 1–7, where 1 corresponds to masculine traits (e.g., blunt) and 7 to feminine traits (e.g., tactful)…”
Hetero-cis–normativity and the gendering of transphobia (2016, background): “Tee and Hegarty (2006) determined that Herek’s (1984) Attitudes to Lesbians and Gay Men (ATLG) scale was strongly related to opposition to transgender civil rights in the United Kingdom.”
Gender-Inclusive Bathrooms Signal Fairness Across Identity Dimensions (2018, background): “Rigid conceptions of gender often underpin negative attitudes toward transgender individuals (Davidson & Czopp, 2014; Tee & Hegarty, 2006) and support for transgender individuals using bathrooms of their natal sex (Roberts, Ho, Rhodes, & Gelman, in press).”
Who Hates Gender Outlaws? A Multisite and Multinational Evaluation of the Genderism and Transphobia Scale (2010, unknown): “E-mail: bwilloughby@partners.org als, transgenders, cross-dressers; e.g., ClementsNolle, Marx, & Katz, 2006; Gagné, Tewksbury, & McGaughey, 1996; Grossman & D’Augelli, 2006; Hill, 2002; Lombardi, Wilchins, Priesing, 254 & Malouf, 2001; Tee & Hegarty, 2006; Witten & Eyler, 1999).”