The effect of resource history on the functioning of soil microbial communities is maintained across time

By A. D. Keiser, M. Strickland, Noah Fierer, M. Bradford. 2011

136 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Historical resource conditions appear to influ- ence microbial community function. With time, histori- cal influences might diminish as populations respond to the contemporary environment. Alternatively, they may persist given factors such as contrasting genetic potentials for adap- tation to a new environment. Using experimental micro- cosms, we test competing hypotheses that function of dis- tinct soil microbial communities in common environments (H1a) converge or (H1b) remain dissimilar over time. Us- ing a 6◊ 2 (soil community inoculum ◊ litter environment) full-factorial design, we compare decomposition rates in ex- perimental microcosms containing grass or hardwood litter environments. After 100 days, communities that develop are inoculated into fresh litters and decomposition followed for another 100 days. We repeat this for a third, 100-day pe- riod. In each successive, 100-day period, we find higher de- composition rates (i.e. functioning) suggesting communities function better when they have an experimental history of the contemporary environment. Despite these functional gains, differences in decomposition rates among initially distinct communities persist, supporting the hypothesis that dissimi- larity is maintained across time. In contrast to function, com- munity composition is more similar following a common, ex- perimental history. We also find that "specialization" on one experimental environment incurs a cost, with loss of func- tion in the alternate environment. For example, experimen- tal history of a grass-litter environment reduced decompo- sition when communities were inoculated into a hardwood- litter environment. Our work demonstrates experimentally that despite expectations of fast growth rates, physiological flexibility and rapid evolution, initial functional differences between microbial communities are maintained across time. These findings question whether microbial dynamics can be omitted from models of ecosystem processes if we are to pre- dict reliably global change effects on biogeochemical cycles.

Subfields: Ecology, Genetics, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6a7b0584254ce076968d7b20fc3cbc0974b26d83

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

  1. M. Strickland
  2. G. T. Freschet
  3. A. D. Keiser
  4. J. H. C. Cornelissen
  5. M. Bradford
  6. Richard P Phillips
  7. Rien Aerts
  8. E. Brzostek

In Genetics

  1. G. T. Freschet

In Molecular Biology

  1. A. D. Keiser
  2. M. Strickland
  3. M. Bradford
  4. G. T. Freschet
  5. Noah Fierer
  6. C. Lauber
  7. J. Rousk
  8. Rob Knight

Citations in the corpus