Maestro: A System for Scalable OpenFlow Control

By Zheng Cai, Alan L. Cox, T. Ng. 2010

303 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6a6c794083cbdf79de0fcd2065699477290b5546

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

DevoFlow: scaling flow management for high-performance networks (2011, background): “We are not the ﬁrst to make this observation; however, others have focused on scaling the controller, e.g., Onix [33], Maestro [11], and a devolved controller design [44].”
Network Innovation using OpenFlow: A Survey (2014, methodology): “This approach relies on creating flows based on the identity of the client and the type of content requested.”
A Survey on Software-Defined Network and OpenFlow: From Concept to Implementation (2014, methodology): “For software controller, there are four publicly-available OpenFlow controllers: NOX, NOX-MT, Beacon, and Maestro [80].”
Software-defined networking (SDN): a survey (2016, unknown): “Maestro [18,100] is a Java-based controller implementation.”
Security in Software Defined Networks: A Survey (2015, unknown): “Similarly, OpenFlow has sprung from the ideas of the 4D project as stated in [12].”
FRESCO: Modular Composable Security Services for Software-Defined Networks (2013, methodology): “However, our methodology could be extended to other architectures like Beacon [30], Maestro [4], and DevoFlow [26].”
A Survey on Software-Defined Wireless Sensor Networks: Challenges and Design Requirements (2017, background): “SDN central controllers include Floodlight [138], [174], Ryu [175], Maestro [136], NOX [62], Beacon [137].”
A security enforcement kernel for OpenFlow networks (2012, methodology): “We build our system on NOX, which is an opensource OF controller [10]; however, our methodology could be extended to other architectures like Beacon [18], Maestro [3], and DevoFlow [15].”
Software defined networking: State of the art and research challenges (2014, unknown): “Another viable solution to alleviate the performance challenge was proposed under the name Maestro [65, 66].”
DISCO: Distributed multi-domain SDN controllers (2013, background): “Researchers mainly focused on improving the performance of a specific controller like Maestro [12] and NOX [13] or demonstrating the improvement offered by OpenFlow against a classic L2 paradigm [14].”