Going Public in the European Union

By Hanspeter Kriesi, A. Tresch, Margit Jochum. 2007

205 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6a681783dba06cf4b6669261a34ecd6b7723a5cd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Bart. Kerremans
2. J. Beyers
3. Caelesta Braun
4. Å. Gornitzka
5. Sebastiaan Princen
6. Ulf Sverdrup

In Strategy and Management

1. Bart. Kerremans
2. J. Beyers
3. Caelesta Braun
4. Å. Gornitzka
5. Sebastiaan Princen
6. Ulf Sverdrup

Citations in the corpus

• Legislative lobbying in context: towards a conceptual framework of interest group lobbying in the European Union (2015, unknown): “In line with the so-called ‘compensation hypothesis’, it is often argued that additional lobbying venues provided by the EU are especially attractive to interest groups that gain little influence at the domestic level (Beyers and Kerremans 2012; Eising 2007; Kriesi et al .”
• Ties that count: explaining interest group access to policymakers (2013, background): “While outside lobbying and media strategies are certainly important, direct access to policymakers seems to count most in influencing public policy (Kollman 1998; Bouwen 2002; Beyers 2004; Binderkrantz 2005, 2008; Kriesi et al. 2007; Baumgartner et al. 2009).”
• Access of Experts: Information and EU Decision-making (2011, background): “Social actors recognise expert groups as an important policy venue, for instance, business associations target the Commission working level most frequently in their efforts to influence EU decision-making (Eising 2007; Kriesi et al. 2007).”
• Pressure and Expertise: Explaining the Information Supply of Interest Groups in EU Legislative Lobbying (2016, unknown): “Thinking about the increased levels of politicization and public scrutiny of EU lobbying processes (Hooghe and Marks, 2009; Kriesi et al., 2007), information supply aimed at pressuring policy-makers with political information might have become a viable strategy to influence EU legislative outcomes.”
• Opportunity Structures in the EU Multi-Level System (2008, background): “This is different for the studies of Beyers (2002), Eising (2004) and Kriesi et al. (2007), who all found that interest groups that are stronger domestically also tend to be more active at the EU level.”