The stability of the MOC as diagnosed from model projections for pre-industrial, present and future climates

138 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Observations, inferences, and mechanisms of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation: A review (2016, background): “…freshwater transport in section 3.3), then the AMOC is in the bistable regime [Rahmstorf , 1996; Schaeffer et al., 2002; de Vries and Weber, 2005; Dijkstra, 2007; Huisman et al., 2010; Hawkins et al., 2011; Drijfhout et al., 2011; Weaver et al., 2012; Deshayes et al., 2013; Liu and Liu, 2014].”
Past, Present, and Future Changes in the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (2012, background): “However, most unconstrained climate model simulations have the freshwater flux in the opposite direction, making them potentially monostable and unable to allow a collapse of the AMOC (Drijfhout et al. 2011).”
A mathematical theory of climate sensitivity or, How to deal with both anthropogenic forcing and natural variability? (2015, background): “a systematic bias in their evaporation-minusprecipitation fluxes (Drijfthout et al., 2011), which led to the wrong sign of Σ in these models.”