LD Score Regression Distinguishes Confounding from Polygenicity in Genome-Wide Association Studies

By Brendan K. Bulik-Sullivan, Po-Ru Loh, Hilary K Finucane, S. Ripke, Jian Yang, Nick Patterson, Mark J. Daly, Alkes L Price, Benjamin M. Neale. Nature Genetics, 2014

5,156 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Both polygenicity (many small genetic effects) and confounding biases, such as cryptic relatedness and population stratification, can yield an inflated distribution of test statistics in genome-wide association studies (GWAS). However, current methods cannot distinguish between inflation from a true polygenic signal and bias. We have developed an approach, LD Score regression, that quantifies the contribution of each by examining the relationship between test statistics and linkage disequilibrium (LD). The LD Score regression intercept can be used to estimate a more powerful and accurate correction factor than genomic control. We find strong evidence that polygenicity accounts for the majority of the inflation in test statistics in many GWAS of large sample size.

Subfields: Genetics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6a53aed6913cf7ffca19ffcc38e2508e98a3878a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Genetics

  1. Alkes L Price
  2. Peter M. Visscher
  3. Matthew Stephens
  4. Frank Dudbridge
  5. Jian Yang
  6. Gibran Hemani
  7. Naomi R. Wray
  8. J. K. Pritchard

Citations in the corpus