On the uncertainties in hot spot reconstructions and the significance of moving hot spot reference frames
By Craig O'Neill, Dietmar Müller, B. Steinberger. 2005
375 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Geophysics, Molecular Biology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6a2cf25fc606ac8ddd7261412de1cb041e08f903
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Geophysics
- Thorsten W. Becker
- C. Faccenna
- F. Funiciello
- R. Dietmar Müller
- S. Lallemand
- A. Heuret
- E. Giuseppe
- T. Torsvik
In Molecular Biology
Citations in the corpus
- Greater India Basin hypothesis and a two-stage Cenozoic collision between India and Asia (2012, methodology): “(A and C) Sixty and 30 Ma plate reconstructions of the India–Asia collision zone in a moving hotspot reference frame (54) projected above seismic tomographic images, derived from the UU-P07 model (55), at 1,175 (0.”
- Trench migration, net rotation and slab-mantle coupling (2008, methodology): “…Sdrolias and Muller (2006) reconstructed the position of the Pacific trenches over the Tertiary using an updated dataset of paleoceanic age grids associated with a moving Atlantic– Indian Ocean hot spot reference frame (O'Neill et al., 2005), recognizing the dominant rollback motion of trenches.”
- Tectonic speed limits from plate kinematic reconstructions (2015, methodology): “Both the moving hotspot (O’Neill et al., 2005) and subduction (van der Meer et al.”