Parallel Algorithm Configuration
By Frank Hutter, Holger H. Hoos, Kevin Leyton-Brown. 2012
95 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Hardware and Architecture
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Frank Hutter
- Marco F. Huber
- Marc-André Zöller
- Holger H. Hoos
- Nando de Freitas
- Quoc V. Le
- Aaron Klein
- Marius Thomas Lindauer
In Hardware and Architecture
- Chris J. Thornton
- Frank Hutter
- Tong Yu
- Hong Zhu
- Nando de Freitas
- Ziyun Wang
- Kevin Leyton-Brown
- Holger H. Hoos
Citations in the corpus
- Hyper-Parameter Optimization: A Review of Algorithms and Applications (2020, methodology): “Various acquisition functions have been proposed in previous studies, including the probability of improvement (Kushner, 1964), GP upper confidence bound (GP-UCB) (Lai and Robbins, 1985; Srinivas et al., 2009), predictive entropy search (Hernández-Lobato et al., 2014), and even a portfolio containi”
- Benchmark and Survey of Automated Machine Learning Frameworks (2019, background): “Executing multiple SMBO instances with different random seeds allows a simple parallelization (Hutter et al., 2012).”
- Taking the Human Out of the Loop: A Review of Bayesian Optimization (2016, methodology): “[80] proposed an approach based on GP-UCB where UCB is optimized using a range of n values, which produces a set of points that favor a range of exploration and exploitation.”
- CMA-ES for Hyperparameter Optimization of Deep Neural Networks (2016, neutral): “, 2012a) or by evaluating the optima of multiple acquisition functions concurrently (Hutter et al., 2012), perfect parallelization appears unattainable since the decisions in each step depend on all data points gathered so far.”
- Algorithm Selection for Combinatorial Search Problems: A Survey (2012, background): “This approach is used for example in SATzilla (Nudelman et al., 2004; Xu, Hutter, Hoos, & Leyton-Brown, 2007; Xu et al., 2008), AQME (Pulina & Tacchella, 2007, 2009), CPhy-dra (O’Mahony, Hebrard, Holland, Nugent, & O’Sullivan, 2008), ArgoSmArT (Nikoli´c, Mari´c, & Janiˇci´c, 2009) and BUS (Howe, Dah”
- A new acquisition function for Bayesian optimization based on the moment-generating function (2017, background): “[31], instantiates multiple LCB functions by sampling several β values from an exponential distribution with the unit mean.”
- Hyperparameter optimization: Foundations, algorithms, best practices, and open challenges (2021, background): “For this so-called qLCB (also referred to as qUCB) approach, Hutter et al. (2012) propose to draw κ from an exponential distribution with rate parameter 1.”
- Auto-WEKA: combined selection and hyperparameter optimization of classification algorithms (2012, methodology): “3Other, more sophisticated methods for the parallelization of Bayesian optimization exist [17, 4, 11, 29], but to date, there is no empirical evidence that these methods outperform the simple approach we use here when the cost of evaluating hyperparameter configurations varies across the space.”
- UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Bayesian Optimization in High Dimensions via Random Embeddings (2013, unknown): “Figure 4 (top) compares BO, REMBO, and the baseline random search against ParamILS (which was used for all con-figuration experiments in [Hutter et al. , 2010]) and SMAC [Hutter et al. , 2011].”
- Bayesian Optimization of Text Representations (2015, background): “There has been work to parallelize Bayesian optimization, making it possible to leverage the power of multicore architectures (Snoek et al., 2012; Desautels et al., 2012; Hutter et al., 2012).”
- Phoenics: A Bayesian Optimizer for Chemistry (2018, methodology): “− 35 Chemical systems can have complex, qualitatively di ff erent response surfaces.”
- Bayesian Optimization in a Billion Dimensions via Random Embeddings (2013, methodology): “However, as shown by Hutter et al. (2012), multiple independent runs can also improve the performance of SMAC and especially ParamILS.”
- Algorithm runtime prediction: Methods & evaluation (2012, methodology): “First, they can model the performance of a parameterized algorithm dependent on the settings of its parameters; in a sequential model-based optimization process, one alternates between learning an EPM and using it to identify promising settings to evaluate next [65,7,59,55,56].”
- Auto-WEKA : combined selection and hyperparameter optimization of supervised machine learning algorithms (2014, methodology): “Other, more sophisticated methods for the parallelization of Bayesian optimization exist [Hutter et al., 2012, Bergstra et al., 2011, Desautels et al., 2012, Snoek et al., 2012], but to date, there is no empirical evidence that these methods outperform the simple approach we used here when the cost…”