Simulation and experimental validation of a freely bubbling bed of FCC catalyst

By Timothy R. Mckeen, T. Pugsley. 2003

317 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6a2415de8deb050913a07f078527bee1c8919f69

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computational Mechanics

Citations in the corpus

Practical validation of the two-fluid model applied to dense gas-solid flows in fluidized beds (2007, background): “On the other hand, bubbling bed simulations with Geldart A particles have had limited success without some kind of model calibration (McKeen and Pugsley, 2003; Zimmermann and Taghipour, 2005), since the momentum exchange between the gas and the particles and thereby the bed expansion is highly over-”
Lagrangian-Eulerian methods for multiphase flows (2013, background): “It is also reported that the average drag experienced by the solid phase can depend significantly on the presence of clusters [106–108].”
Development of filtered Euler–Euler two-phase model for circulating fluidised bed: High resolution simulation, formulation and a priori analyses (2013, background): “For details of high-performance computing with NEPTUNE_CFD, see Neau et al. (2010). By following Anderson and Jackson (1967), Anderson and Jackson (1968), the independent dimensionless parameters governing the fluidised bed dynamics are found by dimensional analysis of the differential equations gov”
Effects of using two- versus three-dimensional computational modeling of fluidized beds: Part I, hydrodynamics (2008, background): “[24], McKeen and Pugsley [25], Chandrasekaran et al.”
Experimental and computational study on the bubble behavior in a 3-D fluidized bed (2011, methodology): “Passalacqua and Marmo (2009) performed a two fluid model simulation of a 2 D bubbling fluidized bed with and without a central jet using different frictional stress models.”