Firm Performance in a Global Market

By Jan De Loecker, P. Goldberg. 2014

304 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6a1ca45730d02818d5987972aea480c2a3aac1d8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Some Unpleasant Markup Arithmetic: Production Function Elasticities and their Estimation from Production Data (2020, background): “12See also De Loecker (2011) and De Loecker and Goldberg (2014).”
The Impact of Trade on Inequality in Developing Countries (2017, unknown): “…suggests that initially better-performing firms are better positioned to withstand and adjust to increased competition from imports, as well as to take advantage of new exporting opportunities (see surveys by Harrison and Rodriguez-Clare 2010, De Loecker and Goldberg 2014, Melitz and Redding 2014).”
On the Relationship between Quality and Productivity: Evidence from China's Accession to the WTO (2017, methodology): “6 Our framework shares much in common with Feenstra and Romalis (2014) who focus primarily on aggregate provision of quality across markets, but do not explore the differential impacts of quality across firms and the heterogeneous response within industry.”
JEEA‐FBBVA LECTURE 2013: THE NEW EMPIRICAL ECONOMICS OF MANAGEMENT (2014, background): “Consequently, measured TFP typically includes an element of the firm-specific price–cost margin (e.g., Klette and Griliches 1996; De Loecker and Goldberg 2014).”
The Gains from Market Integration (2015, background): “…trade openness (Winters et al. 2004, Goldberg & Pavcnik 2007, Harrison et al. 2011), and the consequences of market integration for firm and industry performance (de Loecker & Goldberg 2014), as well as the wider consequences of improvements in transportation infrastructure (Redding & Turner 2014).”
WTO Accession and Performance of Chinese Manufacturing Firms (2017, methodology): “109 for India in De Loecker et al. (2016) obtained using a similar specification, but for a product-level markup.”
Trade Liberalization and Markup Dispersion: Evidence from China's WTO Accession (2015, methodology): “…distributed among 29 two-digit (or 164 three-digit, 464 four-digit) manufacturing industries,10 and across China s 31 provinces (including four municipalities), 344 cities, and 9De Loecker et al. (2014) also include region dummies and product dummies as the determinants of rm-speci c input prices.”
The Impact of Trade Liberalization on Firm Productivity and Innovation (2018, unknown): “For a discussion of the importance of differ‑ entiating between TFPQ and markups, see Foster, Haltiwanger, and Syverson (2008), Gar‑ cia Marin and Voigtländer (2017), De Loecker and Goldberg (2014), and De Loecker and van Biesebroeck (2018).”
International Shocks, Variable Markups, and Domestic Prices (2019, methodology): “5A survey by De Loecker and Goldberg (2014) contrasts these studies with an alternative approach for recovering markups based on production function estimation, which was originally proposed by Hall (1986) and developed by De Loecker and Warzynski (2012).”
Exporting and Plant-Level Efficiency Gains: It’s in the Measure (2019, unknown): “In practice, the estimation of a is subject to input and output price biases (De Loecker and Goldberg 2014).”
Product Mix and Firm Productivity Responses to Trade Competition (2020, background): “6See De Loecker et al. (2016) and Dhyne et al. (2017) for recent evidence on the strong positive correlation between product-level markups and performance (within firms); there is also a long literature estimating this correlation at the firm-level. Berman, Martin and Mayer (2012), Li, Ma and Xu (20”