State-space models for the dynamics of wild animal populations
By S. T. Buckland, K. Newman, L. Thomas, N. Koesters. 2004
192 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Global and Planetary Change
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6a0ac2599f5a130c745619d1f3aa7841af9798be
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
- Jason Matthiopoulos
- Catriona A. Morrison
- R. A. Robinson
- Mark L. Taper
- José Miguel Ponciano
- Subhash R. Lele
- David F. Staples
- S. Baillie
In Global and Planetary Change
- José Miguel Ponciano
- Brian Dennis
- Jason Matthiopoulos
- Mark L. Taper
- Subhash R. Lele
- L. Thomas
- David F. Staples
- Guiquan Sun
Citations in the corpus
- Metapopulation consequences of site fidelity for colonially breeding mammals and birds (2005, methodology): “Such time-saving devices are needed if annual movement models are to be incorporated in population models whose parameters are estimated using computerintensive statistical algorithms, such as Markov chain Monte Carlo (O’Hara et al. 2002; Drechsler et al. 2003) or sequential importance sampling ( Bu”
- ESTIMATING DENSITY DEPENDENCE, PROCESS NOISE, AND OBSERVATION ERROR (2006, methodology): “More recently, Buckland et al. (2004) constructed detailed state-space models with multiple state variables, and Newman et al. (2006) implemented such a model for fisheries data.”
- Integrating demographic data: towards a framework for monitoring wildlife populations at large spatial scales (2014, background): “…of state-space, or hidden-process, models offers the opportunity to develop integrated analyses of population count and demographic data, giving the potential to incorporate unmeasured processes directly in the population models (Buckland et al. 2004; King et al. 2009; Newman et al. 2009).”