Ki-67 as prognostic marker in early breast cancer: a meta-analysis of published studies involving 12 155 patients

By E. Azambuja, F. Cardoso, G. D. Castro, M. Colozza, M. Mano, V. Durbecq, C. Sotiriou, D. Larsimont, M. Piccart-Gebhart, M. Paesmans. British Journal of Cancer, 2007

890 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The Ki-67 antigen is used to evaluate the proliferative activity of breast cancer (BC); however, Ki-67's role as a prognostic marker in BC is still undefined. In order to better define the prognostic value of Ki-67/MIB-1, we performed a meta-analysis of studies that evaluated the impact of Ki-67/MIB-1 on disease-free survival (DFS) and/or on overall survival (OS) in early BC. Sixty-eight studies were identified and 46 studies including 12 155 patients were evaluable for our meta-analysis; 38 studies were evaluable for the aggregation of results for DFS, and 35 studies for OS. Patients were considered to present positive tumours for the expression of Ki-67/MIB-1 according to the cut-off points defined by the authors. Ki-67/MIB-1 positivity is associated with higher probability of relapse in all patients (HR=1.93 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.74–2.14); P<0.001), in node-negative patients (HR=2.31 (95% CI: 1.83–2.92); P<0.001) and in node-positive patients (HR=1.59 (95% CI: 1.35–1.87); P<0.001). Furthermore, Ki-67/MIB-1 positivity is associated with worse survival in all patients (HR=1.95 (95% CI: 1.70–2.24; P<0.001)), node-negative patients (HR=2.54 (95% CI: 1.65–3.91); P<0.001) and node-positive patients (HR=2.33 (95% CI: 1.83–2.95); P<0.001). Our meta-analysis suggests that Ki-67/MIB-1 positivity confers a higher risk of relapse and a worse survival in patients with early BC.

Subfields: Cancer Research, Pathology and Forensic Medicine

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/69fd1ac1046d79278571207ad994f69e64f28da1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cancer Research

  1. A. Stanisławek
  2. Marcin Czeczelewski
  3. Charles M. Perou
  4. Sergiusz Łukasiewicz
  5. Robert Sitarz
  6. J. Baj
  7. Alicja Forma

In Pathology and Forensic Medicine

  1. A. Stanisławek
  2. Marcin Czeczelewski
  3. Sergiusz Łukasiewicz
  4. Robert Sitarz
  5. J. Baj
  6. Alicja Forma

Citations in the corpus