CLIPort: What and Where Pathways for Robotic Manipulation

By Mohit Shridhar, Lucas Manuelli, Dieter Fox. 2021

963 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How can we imbue robots with the ability to manipulate objects precisely but also to reason about them in terms of abstract concepts? Recent works in manipulation have shown that end-to-end networks can learn dexterous skills that require precise spatial reasoning, but these methods often fail to generalize to new goals or quickly learn transferable concepts across tasks. In parallel, there has been great progress in learning generalizable semantic representations for vision and language by training on large-scale internet data, however these representations lack the spatial understanding necessary for fine-grained manipulation. To this end, we propose a framework that combines the best of both worlds: a two-stream architecture with semantic and spatial pathways for vision-based manipulation. Specifically, we present CLIPort, a language-conditioned imitation-learning agent that combines the broad semantic understanding (what) of CLIP [1] with the spatial precision (where) of Transporter [2]. Our end-to-end framework is capable of solving a variety of language-specified tabletop tasks from packing unseen objects to folding cloths, all without any explicit representations of object poses, instance segmentations, memory, symbolic states, or syntactic structures. Experiments in simulated and real-world settings show that our approach is data efficient in few-shot settings and generalizes effectively to seen and unseen semantic concepts. We even learn one multi-task policy for 10 simulated and 9 real-world tasks that is better or comparable to single-task policies.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Reinforcement Learning

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Sergey Levine
  2. Chelsea Finn
  3. Pieter Abbeel
  4. Trevor Darrell
  5. Li Fei-Fei
  6. Mohit Bansal
  7. Quoc V. Le
  8. Yoshua Bengio

In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

  1. Luc Van Gool
  2. Trevor Darrell
  3. Jitendra Malik
  4. Dacheng Tao
  5. Li Fei-Fei
  6. Xiaogang Wang
  7. Andrew Zisserman
  8. Ming-Hsuan Yang

In Reinforcement Learning

  1. Sergey Levine
  2. Chelsea Finn
  3. Pieter Abbeel
  4. Shixiang Shane Gu
  5. Ofir Nachum
  6. Vikash Kumar
  7. Aviral Kumar
  8. Abhishek Gupta

Citations in the corpus