Nutrient conservation strategies in native Andean-Patagonian forests

By P. Diehl, M. Mazzarino, F. Funes, S. Fontenla, M. Gobbi, J. Ferrari. 2003

133 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Global‐scale patterns of nutrient resorption associated with latitude, temperature and precipitation (2009, background): “(2003) and Güsewell (2005), who found that NRE in highlatitude (low-temperature) species is at the high end of the values as compiled by Aerts (1996) and Killingbeck (1996) for a wide range of ecosystems.”
Global resorption efficiencies and concentrations of carbon and nutrients in leaves of terrestrial plants (2012, background): “When nutrient conservation strategies have been related to plant functional type (Aerts 1996, Diehl et al. 2003, Yuan and Chen 2009a), observed LEONARDUS VERGUTZ ET AL.206 Ecological Monographs Vol. 82, No. 2 differences across growth forms and functional groups have also typically been small.”
Patterns and Mechanisms of Nutrient Resorption in Plants (2015, result): “Since then, many studies have provided both positive and contradictory evidence for these null claims (Eckstein et al., 1999; Diehl et al., 2003; Yuan et al., 2005b; Yuan and Chen, 2009a), supported by increased efforts with global syntheses and updated research methods (Vergutz et al., 2012; Yuan…”
Tree species identity alters forest litter decomposition through long‐term plant and soil interactions in Patagonia, Argentina (2008, background): “can modulate their nitrogen use efficiency in response to changes in soil fertility (Diehl et al. 2003) and consequently affect soil N mineralization (Satti et al.”