Do differences in attitudes explain differences in national climate change policies

By E. Tjernström, T. Tietenberg. 2008

255 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/69e59b8384d5d86b842987e544cfbb8bf21d6bba

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

A social trap for the climate? Collective action, trust and climate change risk perception in 35 countries (2018, background): “…development is negatively related to concern for climate change and willingness to sacrifice to address climate change (Kim and Wolinsky-Nahmias, 2014; Kvaløy et al., 2012; Mostafa, 2016; Sandvik, 2008) and climate change risk perceptions (Lee et al., 2015; Tjernström and Tietenberg, 2008).”
Green Returns to Education: Does Schooling Contribute to Pro-Environmental Behaviours? Evidence from Thailand (2017, background): “concern about climate change among individuals with higher education (Kvaloy et al., 2012; Running, 2013; Tjernstrom and Tietenberg, 2008), in the United States there is evidence of an inverse relationship between education and perceived climate change risks, both for general education (O’Connor, Ba”
What explains public support for climate policies? A review of empirical and experimental studies (2016, background): “More specifically, when comparing countries, citizens’ concern about climate change is associated with lower GHG emissions, suggesting that public attitudes translate into policy action (Tjernström & Tietenberg, 2008).”
Energy saving in Swedish households. The (relative) importance of environmental attitudes (2011, background): “…studies of political trust make us assume that within the fields of energy and climate policies, individuals with high political trust might be more keen on adapting their energy behaviours than are those with lower degrees of trust (Tjernström and Tietenberg, 2008: 321f; Marien and Hooghe, 2010).”