More than just novelty: conceptual blending and causality
By Rodolphe Durand, Joep Cornelissen. 2012
58 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, History and Philosophy of Science, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/69e1e227918bddbe8d08da4b0ae45697d8ed866b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
In History and Philosophy of Science
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Tyler Wry
- Rodolphe Durand
- P. Devereaux Jennings
- Michael Lounsbury
- Vibha Gaba
- John Joseph
- Joep Cornelissen
- Christopher Marquis
Citations in the corpus
- Moving Forward: Developing Theoretical Contributions in Management Studies (2014, background): “Instead, its primary purpose is simply to spotlight base assumptions or ideas in the pre-existing domain of a local theory or literature (Turner, 1996), to stimulate reflectivity, and to see the potential (but only the potential) for changing conceptual frames (Cornelissen and Durand, 2012).”
- Hybrid Vigor: Securing Venture Capital by Spanning Categories in Nanotechnology (2014, methodology): “We develop an alternate approach based on composite concept cognition where category combinations, as opposed to individual categories, are the focal unit of analysis (Cohen & Murphy, 1984; Hampton, 1988; Murphy, 1988; Murphy & Medin, 1985; see also Cornelissen & Durand, 2012).”
- Organizational Structure, Information Processing, and Decision-Making: A Retrospective and Road Map for Research (2020, background): “Certain ones may be altered so as to conform to the particular properties of the situation in which they are introduced (Cornelissen & Durand, 2012; Durand &Paolella, 2013); othersmay simply fall into disuse.”