Wh-Subjects in English and the Vacuous Movement Hypothesis

By Brian Agbayani. Linguistic Inquiry, 2000

63 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Language and Linguistics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/69d6d051e12e2683980f04a4f4cebd948af8f727

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

1. Ž. Bošković
2. Jon Gajewski
3. Vicki Carstens

In Language and Linguistics

1. Ž. Bošković
2. William Harwood
3. Jon Gajewski
4. Andrew Radford
5. Vicki Carstens

Citations in the corpus

• On the Locality and Motivation of Move and Agree: An Even More Minimal Theory (2007, background): “The current analysis also bears on the controversial issue of whether subject wh-phrases in constructions like (76) undergo movement to Spec,CP (for recent discussion, see Agbayani 2000, Pesetsky and Torrego 2001, Boeckx 2003b, An 2007).”