Sensitive detection of Ralstonia solanacearum in soil: a comparison of different detection techniques

By P. Pradhanang, J. Elphinstone, R. V. Fox. 2000

93 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Advanced methods of plant disease detection. A review (2014, unknown): “Sensitivity and specificity can be increased with nPCR (Simmonds et al. 1990; Olmos et al. 1997; Pradhanang et al. 2000), performed in two steps, using one or two internal primers.”
Ralstonia solanacearum Race 3 Biovar 2 Causes Tropical Losses and Temperate Anxieties (2009, methodology): “solanacearum R3bv2 can be identified following recovery from either symptomatic or asymptomatic plants and from water or soil samples by means of several microbiological and molecular methods (25,27,33).”
Interaction between silicon amendment, bacterial wilt development and phenotype of Ralstonia solanacearum in tomato genotypes (2004, background): “solanacearum was frequently reported in stored cultures [30,38], but reasons for the transformation are unknown.”