Loss to Follow-Up in Cohort Studies: How Much is Too Much?
By V. Kristman, M. Manno, P. Côté. European Journal of Epidemiology, 2003
685 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/69c412cb563aa86a93bed12b6125b11559cf032f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- M. Fewtrell
- A. Lucas
- A. Singhal
- Berthold Koletzko
- K. Kennedy
- Richard M. Martin
- Andy Ness
- M. Hadders‐Algra
Citations in the corpus
- How much loss to follow-up is acceptable in long-term randomised trials and prospective studies? (2008, background): “Rates of 50–80% follow-up have been suggested as acceptable by different authors in the context of epidemiological cohorts, although in most cases the validity of these recommendations has not been tested.(3) 4”
- Long-term Follow-up After Bariatric Surgery (2014, neutral): “Ray and Ray,33 2011 Weight loss NR 82 5 66 (80) 58 NR 47 (35-78) NR NR”
- The design of simulation studies in medical statistics (2006, neutral): “[2–4]).”