Resolving the geometrically necessary dislocation content by conventional electron backscattering diffraction

868 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The dislocation behaviour and GND development in a nickel based superalloy during creep (2019, background): “Electron Backscatter Diffraction (EBSD), however, can calculate GND type, but cannot recognise SSD type [Pantleon 2005, 2008, Kerr 2013].”
Assessment of geometrically necessary dislocation levels derived by 3D EBSD (2015, background): “(6) is often used, by an implicit change of the sample reference frame [3,8,9].”
Consistent determination of geometrically necessary dislocation density from simulations and experiments (2018, background): “If the assumption is made that the effect of lattice strains is negligible, five components may be determined (Pantleon, 2008).”
A Review of Strain Analysis Using Electron Backscatter Diffraction (2011, background): “…a more complete description of the strain state within the material ~Sun et al., 2000; El-Dasher et al., 2003; Field et al., 2005; Wilkinson et al., 2006b; Pantleon, 2008!. Figure 29 shows the w12 rotation component of the strain tensor in austenite surrounding a lenticular martensite grain.”