Effect of retained austenite on subsequent thermal processing and resultant mechanical properties of selective laser melted 17–4 PH stainless steel
By T. Lebrun, T. Nakamoto, K. Horikawa, Hidetoshi Kobayashi. 2015
254 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Mechanical Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6995575082e40558e7c9b17d83fa409996105711
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Mechanical Engineering
Citations in the corpus
- Steels in additive manufacturing: A review of their microstructure and properties (2020, background): “As is the case for other AM-produced steels, given the correct heat treatment, the strength of the material can be as good as or even surpassing conventionally-produced material, but typically at slightly lower ductility [94,97].”
- Selective Laser Melting of Duplex Stainless Steel Powders: An Investigation (2016, background): “Of the five classes of stainless steels, mainly austenitic 316 L [15] and precipitation hardening 15–5 [17] and 17–4 [18] stainless steels attained further research attention applying SLM.”
- Wire + Arc Additive Manufacture of 17-4 PH stainless steel: Effect of different processing conditions on microstructure, hardness, and tensile strength (2019, methodology): “Comprehensive hardness maps were presented by Rashid et al. (2017) for two different SLM scan strategies, single and double melting of each layer.”
- Additive manufacturing of metallic components – Process, structure and properties (2018, background): “3 375 ± 3 [485] H1025 (550 C for 4 h) 870 ± 25 1358 ± 8 13.”
- Additive manufacturing of steels: a review of achievements and challenges (2020, background): “JOM 69(3):506–515 [142] LeBrun T, Nakamoto T, Horikawa K, Kobayashi H (2015)”
- Effect of processing parameters on microstructure and tensile properties of austenitic stainless steel 304L made by directed energy deposition additive manufacturing (2016, background): “While austenite has the potential to transform to martensite with plastic deformation [11,28,29], the ferrite volume fraction remains constant with deformation [30]; therefore, any increase in magnetic permeability can be attributed to a phase transformation from austenite to martensite.”