References Examining Assaults by Women on Their Spouses or Male Partners: An Annotated Bibliography

By Martin S. Fiebert. 2004

157 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, General Health Professions, Health

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/698c74332ad44449efbbe6c947ff94bd20d770bf

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

1. Ko Ling Chan
2. D. Dutton
3. Tonia L. Nicholls
4. Ethel L. Mickey
5. Murray A. Straus
6. Lynette M. Renner
7. Stephen D. Whitney
8. Catherine Hamilton-Giachritsis

In General Health Professions

1. Ethel L. Mickey
2. Catherine Hamilton-Giachritsis
3. Ko Ling Chan
4. Lynette M. Renner
5. Murray A. Straus
6. Stephen D. Whitney
7. D. Saunders
8. D. Dutton

In Health

1. Murray A. Straus
2. D. Dutton
3. Ko Ling Chan
4. Tonia L. Nicholls
5. Lynette M. Renner
6. Stephen D. Whitney
7. Ethel L. Mickey
8. Catherine Hamilton-Giachritsis

Citations in the corpus

• Gender symmetry in partner violence: Evidence and implications for prevention and treatment. (2009, background): “Gender Symmetry in Prevalence and Motivation More than 200 studies have found that men and women petpetrate partner violence at approximately equal rates and that the most prevalent pattern is mutual violence (Archer, 2002; Fiebert, 2004).”
• The gender paradigm in domestic violence research and theory: Part 1—The conflict of theory and data (2005, background): “There are now over 159 family conflict studies demonstrating relatively consistently that there is a rough gender equivalency of conflict, abuse, and violence in intimate relationships in North America (Straus, 1999; also see Archer, 2000a; Fiebert, 1997, 2004; Sugarman & Hotaling, 1989).”
• The Co-occurrence of Child and Intimate Partner Maltreatment in the Family: Characteristics of the Violent Perpetrators (2007, background): “However, approximately 100 research studies have documented rates of partner violence to be equal for both men and women (e.g. Archer 2000, 2002; Fiebert 2001) and Archer (2000) in his meta-analytic review demonstrates that while women are injured more often that men, men constitute approximately…”
• Examining Symmetry in Intimate Partner Violence Among Young Adults Using Socio-Demographic Characteristics (2010, background): “A review of 126 empirical studies and 29 reviews of literature by Fiebert (2004) showed that women are as, or more, physically aggressive than men in partnered relationships.”
• Reliability, validity, and prevalence of partner violence measured by the conflict tactics scales in male-dominant nations (2012, background): “This is consistent with the results of more than 200 other studies that reported PV perpetration rates for both women and men (Archer, 2000; Fiebert, 2010).”
• Are Physical Assaults by Wives and Girlfriends a Major Social Problem? (2002, background): “GENERAL INADEQUACIES OF PRIOR RESEARCH Many studies, including the majority of studies in the Fiebert (1997, 1998) bibliographies, simply count the rates of violence by men and women.”
• Why the Overwhelming Evidence on Partner Physical Violence by Women Has Not Been Perceived and Is Often Denied (2009, unknown): “First, the evidence showing gender symmetry has been covered elsewhere (Archer, 2000; Capaldi, Kim, & Shortt, 2007; Capaldi & Owen, 2001; Fiebert, 2004; Moffitt, Caspi, Rutter, & Silva, 2001; Straus, 2005, 2007a), and therefore is not addressed here.”
• Gender differences in self-reports of intimate partner violence: A review (2011, background): “Prior reviews or meta-analyses on gender issues on IPV are often not up-to-date (e.g., Archer, 2000, 2002) or intentionally conducted as informal narrative reviews (e.g., Fiebert, 1997, 2009).”